Thursday, August 28, 2008

Obama stands on the shoulders of men AND women


Senator Obama's acceptance speech tonight comes with much anticipation. He will speak 45 years after MLK's "I have a dream" speech, and you can bet you'll hear that fact a couple gazillion times before the night is over. His acceptance will most certainly address King's powerful and influential speech. I read an excellent article written in the Nation by Melissa Harris-Lacewell that reminds us not to trivialize the role of African-American female organizers of King's time. She writes:


When Barack Obama takes the stage in Denver, he could draw on the political rhetoric of African-American women as the core of his historic speech. The Obama candidacy is built on the organizational foundation laid by these women at least as much as it is on the oratorical showmanship of black male preachers. Obama's speeches may be reminiscent of Dr. King, but his organizing fellows program, use of existing social networks and concern with sustained mobilization recall Ella Baker, the inspirational activist whose work set the course for every major civil rights organization of her time. It was Baker who kept refocusing the movement on organizing rather than oratory, and her work showed that when citizens are given the skills to organize on their own behalf, rather than relying on charismatic leaders to show them the way, real change happens.
Collectively we know very little about the deeds, lives and words of Baker and other black women leaders. Many Americans assume that they spoke about parochial, narrow or self-centered topics. Quite the opposite is true; black women's political work hits the notes of inclusion, universalism and patriotism that Obama needs to emphasize.

Read the whole article here

Monday, August 25, 2008

WHEN TWO PEOPLE LOVE EACH OTHER VERY MUCH...

This here is to serve as the minutes for our enthralling discussion on sex. Thanks to Roz and friends for hosting and providing libations! First we examined an article about a silly disease called HASD (hypo-active sex drive or something). While some of us were worried about the implications of scientists getting involved in the how much and how often of sex, we had a lot of ideas about why some women "just don't feel like it". Among the culprits: the infamous high school double standard of slut v. stud, body image problems reinforced by popular media, "society problems", negative sexual experiences, etc., etc.

The libations and the nature of the discussion made it difficult to maintain the level of detail displayed above.

Other highlights:
  • women "peaking" in their 30's- fact or myth, and why?
  • multiple orgasms, and how
  • getting "in the mood", worrying about getting out of the mood, thereby losing the mood
  • WHAT WOULD SEX BE LIKE WITHOUT THE MEDIA'S PORTRAYAL OF SEX?
  • long-term relationships and sex
  • how often are you supposed to? three times per week? WHOA!
  • the ethics of "faking it"
  • the satisfaction derived from giving satisfaction
  • sexual dominance and positions that evoke the dominant/submissive setup, and is this cool or oppressive?

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Next VP?


Today, Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama announced that Senator Joe Biden is his running mate. Biden's long-time commitment to passing legislation to combat domestic violence and offer legal support to abuse victims is one of his many accomplishments. As voters and citizens, this is a time for us to examine each candidate's stance (and past legislative efforts, failures, and objectives) on various issues affecting women. It is also a time to place pressure on candidates and offer criticism while they still desperately want our vote (especially us Pennsylvanians).

To read more from Joe Biden on domestic violence, click here.

To contact one of the major candidates running for president: Bob Barr, John McCain, Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Barack Obama.

This is in no way an endorsement of either Barack Obama or Joe Biden.

Friday, August 22, 2008

Show at Vox Populi, August 28!


The Women's Social Collaborative is pleased to present its first show at 8pm (SHARP!) on Thursday, August 28 at Vox Populi. Come and check out some local female musicians (and one male!). Donations are welcome to support the artists. Beer will also be available...

See you there!


where there's woman




Woah, what a roller coaster ride of a discussion we had Monday!
We must extend another huge thank you to Abby for hosting (and cobbler!) in her cozy and ornate living room. To review, we first went over some very exciting administrative items. Show at Vox Populi Thursday!! More information to come...

Our discussion, focusing on gender and sexual relationships, started with a bit of a struggle as we tried to figure out what exactly gender means to us and what the term and historical trappings of the word WOMAN means to our individual sense of identity. Is that something you ever consider? I definitely feel like I have a sense of what it means but to work it out in words was a personal challenge.

Talk then snaked all around, from gender identity to power in relationships (masculine/feminine?) to gay marriage and personal political responsibility. Sound a little heavy? This topic was definitely a little more abstract than our previous conversations. We didn't even get around to talking about any sexy girl times or cool boob touching we may have had! But it was seriously very interesting and enlightening talk, and could have gone on for many more hours.


We picked this topic primarily to discuss gender and sexuality in our lives, but as these sexual identities become blurred by the introduction of political identities, cultural identities, and simply human identities, I find myself grappling with a huge load of history, biology, and politics pushed onto my shaky little frame.

Those who were present, what were your impressions? Those who weren't, can you dig?

NEXT UP!! Monday, September 8th - Marriage and Family
facilitated by Vicki

Thursday, August 14, 2008

like humans do



Lorraine and I are so pleased to be your discussion facilitators for Monday evening's topic. This week, we're focusing on gender and sexuality with an emphasis on queer issues.

To whet your appetites, please check out these articles:

Gay Unions Shed Light on Gender and Marriage
What Women Want (Maybe) and ABC News: Bisexual Until Graduation
A Soldier's Legacy
Katy Perry Plays Make Believe and the video

ok! so that's just to get started. obviously there is enough to do an entire series on all of these issues, but hopefully we will get a good start Monday.

Update! for readers who perhaps are not privy to meeting details, we are meeting Monday (8/18) evening. if you're interested in attending and you live in Philadelphia leave a comment so we can get in touch. Also, let's get the conversation started here, leave your comments!

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Using GPS To Track Abusers

According to Ms. Magazine, 7 states now use GPS (global positioning satellite) to track domestic abusers:
In most GPS systems, the offender is outfitted with an electronic anklet that communicates with a satellite. The victim can designate “exclusionzones,” such as her home or office, in which she would like to be protected. In the best programs, if her abuser enters these zones, police and the victim are notified immediately. In many cases, the offender pays for the cost of the monitoring, which is about $10 a day—much cheaper than the cost of incarceration.
In a sense, this seems like a great way to protect women. Police can interfere immediately if the victim is in danger, and a woman does not have to go into hiding if she fears for her safety. The abuser, not the victim, must be the one who is most inconvenienced. The victim is then free to continue living and working as she wishes.

Unfortunately, the idea of monitoring civilians raises quite a few civil liberties' issues. At a Coalition Against Gender Violence conference in February, one Harvard student offered up some concerns, as described by Katie Mapes:

Alanna Buchanan, '08, discussed the impact of GPS monitoring of batterers in black communities, noting that black women experience 35% higher rates of domestic violence than white women. In black communities, she noted, women may feel that they are betraying their community by turning men over to a racist system. GPS monitoring could also be used by police to disproportionately and unjustly monitor the activities of black men, not an unjustified fear in light of studies demonstrating a racist bias in the criminal justice system.
Compromising our civil liberties, even when dealing with criminals, is a very dangerous approach to our problems.

I am reminded of Catharine MacKinnon's call for censorship of pornography. It is true that much of pornography is violent, oppressive, dominating, and horrific. However, this censorship starts to pave the way for other violations of civil rights. Defining "pornography" is, in itself, difficult, subjective, and could lead to all kinds of right-wing nonsense.

Nadine Strossen writes in response to MacKinnon,

The feminist procensorship movement is a far greater threat to women's rights than is the sexual expression it condemns with the epithet "pornography." For women who cherish liberty and equality, Big Sister is as unwelcome in our lives as Big Brother. (From Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights)
As women, when we fight for our rights, protections, and freedoms, we need to make sure that we don't lose the ones we already have along the way.

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Deluded We Stand

I want to share this blog from Huffingtonpost.com, written by Dr. Kathleen Reardon, USC professor:

Deluded We Stand on Race and Gender